Monday, December 30, 2013

vapingpoint: My thoughts on the Debate in the House of Commons ...

vapingpoint: My thoughts on the Debate in the House of Commons ...: Debate in the House of Commons On Standardised packaging 3rd September 2013 (to Column 27WH ) Let me show you some of the things that we...

Monday, December 23, 2013

Dick Puddlecote: World Begins To Realise It's Not About Health

Dick Puddlecote: World Begins To Realise It's Not About Health: It was back in 2010 when I first mentioned the potential of e-cigs to show up the tobacco control industry and their lapdog politicians for ...

Saturday, December 21, 2013

Gluggler's Blog: Nicotine equivalence - why 20mg in ecigs are NOT t...

Gluggler's Blog: Nicotine equivalence - why 20mg in ecigs are NOT t...: It can be very frustrating when I read that people in the EU, making laws about e-cigs, seem to be saying that liquid containing 20mg/ml...

Friday, December 20, 2013

vapingpoint: A history lesson for vapers Part Two - the Reforma...

vapingpoint: A history lesson for vapers Part Two - the Reforma...: In the 1500's The Church (Catholic) was mighty powerful and wealthy. What The Church said in their Dogma and Creed was what was true and...

Thursday, December 19, 2013

vapingpoint: A history lesson for vapers Part One - The dissolu...

vapingpoint: A history lesson for vapers Part One - The dissolu...: Monks living in their Monasteries in the 1500's in England, the most powerful land owners of all, could not get their heads round the un...

Wednesday, December 18, 2013

DEMONS IN POLITICS

I did not write this and will not expose the writer.... HERE IS WHAT HE WROTE!


For those that don't know, the tobacco settlement money is the end result of what started as a class action lawsuit against tobacco companies on behalf of people that were dead or dying from illnesses that were, at the time, believed to be smoking related. The settlement that was finally agreed upon was about 266 billion dollars to be payed in perpetuity, that is, payments would be made to the settlement basically forever since the tobacco companies couldn't pay it off in any reasonable amount of time without going bankrupt. After the payment plan was finalized, 46 State Attorneys General pulled off the sort of scam we've come to expect from our lawyers and politicians, essentially stealing whatever funds the case lawyers and courts hadn't already claimed, at first with the promise that the funds would be used to help offset healthcare costs for the treatment of smoking related illnesses and to fund smoking cessation programs. 

However, since the payments are to be made in perpetuity the tobacco companies cannot be allowed to fail since that would stop those payments. So smoking cessation programs must be designed to fail since the TS income relies on keeping tobacco companies profitable. And smoking related illnesses somehow didn't decline with the falling rates of smoking among consumers. In fact, those illnesses have steadily increased and evidence grows day by day that smoking related illnesses are far fewer and less significant than we were told. Healthcare costs have risen steadily even as smoking has declined. meanwhile, just very recently, those same State Attorneys General that confiscated the settlement money from the families of the lawsuit plaintiffs with the full backing of the federal government and the medical industrial complex and financial cartels, wrote new laws allowing them to basically spend the money in whatever way they see fit as long as they at least pretend to use some small portion of it to finance anti tobacco programs. This is why you see bans on smoking from city councils, mayors and "public health advocacy" groups. because those people are being paid to enact those bans. The earliest bans indicated the greediest politicians and pundits, the ones that were all set to snatch at the first offer of cash. The later bans and those coming to a town near you are indicators of more savvy politicians and pundits that are holding out for bigger payments or that haven't yet figured out how to accept the bribes in a manner that won't look like they're accepting bribes.

This doesn't even touch on the "Sin Tax" scam we have here in the US where cigarettes are taxed at astonishingly high rates to the point where any given government body makes more money off of a consumers purchase of cigarettes than the tobacco company makes.

This is also not even touching the considerable cash flow through the insurance cartels (they charge smokers higher premiums) and the medical industrial complex that thrives on treating "smoking related illness" and "addiction" often convincing healthy people that they're sick just so they can sell their fake cures.

This is also not even touching on the power gained by authorities anytime they exert control over "public and private behavior models" by either over regulating a market until it is forced underground where it becomes profitable to the justice system or by criminalizing a market and gaining full authoritarian control over large segments of the population through fear and intimidation.

It's a tangled web and it's crawling with creatures that would give spiders bad dreams.

#IMPROOF presents Karen Lee

Tuesday, December 03, 2013

EP-ology by Carl V. Phillips: Why tobacco use modeling need economic mechanisms ...

EP-ology by Carl V. Phillips: Why tobacco use modeling need economic mechanisms ...: I have not been doing a great job of creating updates about my THR modeling work, so here is one easy very-partial remedy for that.  The FDA...